Emerging multipolarity in Asia: Dynamics, challenges, and the rise of India as a superpower

Introduction

Throughout the decades-long cold war, the world split into two major blocs to maintain power dynamics. Subsequently, issues have emerged to influence international order with no monopolization by a superpower prevailing and the notion regarding stake for all nations outweighs the old international practices. Americans and the Chinese are competing to emerge as a hegemon, a tussle for power. This trend will remain along with other economic stakes from the EU, AU, Latin America, ASEAN, BRICS, and other regional groupings, altering the power equilibrium under various scenarios. Geopolitical trends and economies have shifted their approach from being highly centered around America.

Body:

Introductory Part

The ongoing Russo-Ukraine, successive coups in Africa, political instability in Latin America & Asia, and continuous provocations in the Taiwan Strait allegedly caused global financial upheavals that have lately rattled the world. A fourth version is currently set into motion, relying on historical assets while introducing novel emerging tech possibilities. By the second half of this century, Asia might account for fifty per cent of the world’s GDP and sixty per cent of global consumption in a multipolar world. 

Descriptive Part:

With India, China, Japan, GCC, and ASEAN all playing important roles in crucial financial matters, Asia have continuously dominated the world in various sectors over the last decades. The IMF forecasts that this pattern will hold true since Asia will outperform the West in terms of revenue indicators. Multipolarity provides greater possibilities for nations to engage hence potential crises can also emerge given that every country’s national interest becomes nuanced in the mechanism and hence accommodating them gets challenging. Given the rise in alliances and groupings, the multi-polar order would provide room for discrepancies, encouraging reorganization and increasing chaos. Regional conflicts may trigger a large-scale invasion to unfold. The security conundrum caused by the arms race will also lead to the destabilization of the multifaceted order. DPRK continues to pursue its own arsenal which could create possible nuclear confrontation in the region. North Korean attempts may trigger ROK, Japan, China, and other nations to expedite their nuke procurements while altering their diplomatic strategies in light of an escalation in Asia.

The accelerated growth of India and China has boosted the desire for Asianisation by raising requirements for fossil fuels from West Asian nations, which have become the primary consumer base for oil supplies. A surge in energy prices supported the growth of investments, among the MENA countries, including the GCC members having earnings and revenue assets surpassing 1.7 trillion dollars. These nations have boosted their consumption of exports to industrializing Asia. In addition, they have boosted their commitment to promoting infrastructure in developing Asian economies. 

While non-alignment created the circumstances for the formation of alliances like the BRICS, it also aroused the attention of hegemonic nations. Regional leaders, who have funds or a strategic edge, increased their presence in certain zones to alter the geopolitical landscape according to their desired ends. These counter-hegemons like the USA, Russia, China, France, UK typically intervened in areas with a stronger interest, such as Central Asia, the Middle East, or the Indo-Pacific for that matter.

While attempting to change the geopolitical trends of SE Asia and strengthen ties with Japan, South Korea, India, and other Asian collaborators, had to aid their strategic components in West Asia, demonstrating a solid footing and bolstering defense affiliation to their regular allies’ while being proactively involved within the MENA’s emergencies. So, what constitutes the main causes behind the Asian interests in addition to what are the larger consequences of the emerging Asian ‘convergence’ regarding the multilateral multipolar world? 

Pan-Asian linkages are less robust: for instance, the ASEAN is more formalized than a single East & West Asian system. In fact, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership provide an additional systematic interaction, unlike any Asian alternative. The SCO has recognized India, Iran, Mongolia, and Pakistan as suitable for affiliation, and represents the closet form of an Asian multipolar forum. If the SCO expands, Russia will remain the sole ‘Eurasian’ participant, and all these ten nations will constitute over twenty per cent of global GDP with over forty per cent of the worldwide population, and more than twenty-five per cent of global hydrocarbon reserves.

To complicate issues further, the concept of Asian multipolarism is controversial; and represents a combination of varied nations, asymmetrical and disparate powers, with contentious legacies. Despite its prevalence, regional politics has created division across Asia which can be attributed to several sections: Asia- Pacific, South, West, and Central Asia. The first region, which includes East Asian nations, has complicated foundations from the Second World War division of supremacy and is likely to be segmented into a pair of vibrant sub-areas: SE Asia and NE Asia.

The regional structure of the MENA is similarly competitive but significantly more chaotic. Conflicts involving Arab governments, independent extremist entities, and Israel have served as an integral part of the area over the years, and decades-long wars have accomplished influence on both diplomatic and bilateral engagements within this geo-strategic region. In addition, protests, and coups have altered the internal structure of governments. 

For a substantial portion of the 20th century, Asia became governed by power demands. Although attempts have been made by others, including ASEAN, to stay away from hegemonic forces, international partnerships continued to influence the very essence of regional power dynamics. In fact, an external superpower’s involvement in Asia is most of the time dictated by a regional leader to bring about security and stability. 

Asian countries are interested in becoming collaborators, and multiple opportunities are being developed to promote these factors, including the Japan-GCC Free Trade Agreement, the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum, the Indo-GCC Business Forum, the GCC-China Economic Forum, and the Kuala Lumpur-based GCC-ASEAN Economic Centre. These forums aid in ensuring the transparency and security of the flow of goods and services among Asian states, in addition to the advancement of new systems.

Additional Information:

India’s rise as a superpower in a Multipolar Asia:

India’s G20 leadership seeks a multipolar Asia,’ with integrated regional influence and shared governance status for all states. This strategy is premised on the notion that China’s progress in Eurasia is disorienting the power dynamics and undermining India’s strategic options. Although India has become more receptive to China’s commitment to international frameworks, the Chinese geopolitical thirst for power additionally generated an imperative for prudence.

Three important aspects underpin India’s plans for a multifaceted Asia. Firstly, Delhi seeks to improve the international system of governance by making it more egalitarian, diverse, and democratic. China has benefited both historically and structurally from its status as a long-standing member of the UN Security Council (UNSC). India’s core strategic goal is always to achieve equal representation with the Chinese in diplomatic bodies, particularly the UN Security Council. New Delhi’s participation in the G4 with Japanese, Germans and Brazilian on the world stage, demonstrates a multipolar attitude.

Second, both small and big Asian states ought to have equal footing in regional decision-making. Indian endorsement of the ASEAN-centered system as well as its membership in RCEP underlines its desire for a collaborative strategy for economic integration. A multilateral Asia will boost the nation’s maritime position within the Asia-Pacific. Chinese feels threatened by India’s economic activity in the South China Sea, particularly its joint energy extraction alongside Vietnam. Additionally, recurrent Chinese vessel activities near Indian waters have alarmed Delhi. The construction of marine facilities throughout the Indian Ocean by the Chinese for its BRI projects (MSRI) has also aroused suspicions.

The third pillar of India’s push for multipolarity is inclusivity, rather than exclusivity. Multipolarity allows space for an external power like the United States to contribute to the region’s evolving security architecture. It also allows India to promote a regional paradigm of ‘shared leadership’ among the three major Asian powers: India, China, and Japan. From New Delhi’s perspective, if the United States and Global South is excluded from Asia, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s proposition of an ‘Asia for Asians’ will remain only a nomenclature, making Asia a China-dominated region.

A multifaceted agenda is intended to facilitate Indian interests in and out of organizations supported by Beijing and America despite observing any of those separate agendas. Several China-backed international institutions have been embraced by India. Primarily the AIIB’s second-highest investor India has long viewed it as a regional Asian intergovernmental agency that will assist in the development of global and domestic systems. Entering the AIIB was perceived as an unparalleled move by India to play a larger role in multilateral organizational leadership. Alternatively, India has long been skeptical regarding the development of the BRI and has raised questions regarding its credibility as a connectivity program, stating such projects should be founded on ‘universally accepted global standards, including ‘good governance, rule of law, accessibility, and egalitarianism.’ India sees the BRI’s CPEC component as an extensive geopolitical impediment because it violates India’s territorial integrity and statehood.

Conclusion

Asia was never a homogeneous region, and it does not endorse unilateralism. Despite many similarities, multipolar lies at the root of Asian civilization. Regarding cultures, customs, and practices, Asia remains eclectic. Asia has additionally experienced its fair share of supremacy and power struggles. Many of them persist to this day, along with fresh strife and divisions continuing to emerge. Nonetheless, Asia possesses an understanding of its rich legacy and combined past encounters. Using its Act East policy, Neighbourhood policy, and SAGAR project, India has embraced a multipolar Asia where Delhi plays an increasing part in international politics. A perfect realignment with Beijing would sustain and strengthen India’s rise while not competing with China’s rise.

References

ASEAN stats Data Portal, ASEAN Community Statistical System. https://data.aseanstats.org/fdi-by-hosts-and-sources.

Regional Economic outlook. (2021, October 22), IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/REO

Null. (2022, April 16). Russia-Ukraine war: Is multipolarity the cause of crisis? ORF. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/russia-ukraine-war-is-multipolarity-the-cause-of-crisis/

Chronology of U.S.-North Korean nuclear and missile diplomacy, 1985-2022 | Arms Control Association. (n.d.). https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron

Seshasayee, H. (2023, April 6). India’s moment in the geopolitics of oil. ORF. https://www.orfonline.org/research/indias-moment-in-the-geopolitics-of-oil/

ET EnergyWorld & www.ETEnergyworld.com. (2023, May 2). India, China propose “multiple pathways” on cutting use of fossil fuels: sources. ETEnergyworld.com. https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/india-china-propose-multiple-pathways-on-cutting-use-of-fossil-fuels-sources/99936214

Al-Marzouqi, A. H., & Arabi, A. A. (2022). Research performance of the GCC countries: A comparative analysis of quantity and quality. Heliyon, 8(11), e11309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11309

The new geopolitics of East and West Asia: Emerging security trends. (n.d.). Asia Society. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/events/new-geopolitics-east-and-west-asia-emerging-security-trends

CFR.org Editors. (2022, April 11). What is ASEAN? Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-asean

Will the EU step up to secure rules-based Indo-Pacific trade? (n.d.). Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/will-eu-step-secure-rules-based-indo-pacific-trade

Ibid. https://indiainsco.in/docpdf/62

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit 2022: key takeaways. (2022, September 23). ODI: Think Change. https://odi.org/en/insights/shanghai-cooperation-organisation-summit-2022-key-takeaways/

Aliyu, S., Mohammad, A. R., & Wahab, N. A. (2023). Probability of default and political instability in the MENA region. Managerial Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-09-2022-0410

Davos 2022: What role will “ASEAN” play in a shifting geopolitical landscape? (2022, May 22). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/05/asean-geopolitical-role/

Chaudhury, D. R. (2023, March 28). Multipolar Asia could lead to multipolar world: Experts. The Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/multipolar-asia-could-lead-to-multipolar-world-experts/articleshow/99063524.cms?from=mdr

G, C. (2022). China’s evolving strategic discourse on India. Stimson Center. https://www.stimson.org/2022/chinas-evolving-strategic-discourse-on-india/

Brands, J. S. H. (2020, May 22). China Has Two Paths To Global Domination. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/05/22/china-has-two-paths-to-global-domination-pub-81908

Ibid. https://mea.gov.in/Uploads/PublicationDocs/36286_MEA_Annual_Report_2022_English_web.pdf

Ibid. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/India27s-foreign-affairs-strategy.pdf

India-ASEAN Relations: The need to reconsider RCEP | FULCRUM. (2023, April 20). FULCRUM. https://fulcrum.sg/india-asean-relations-the-need-to-reconsider-rcep/

Writer, S. (2022, July 4). India-Vietnam defense ties on upswing as both eye China. Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/Indo-Pacific/India-Vietnam-defense-ties-on-upswing-as-both-eye-China

Peri, D. (2023, April 29). Chinese research vessels operating close to India’s areas of national interest pose a challenge: Navy Chief. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/large-presence-of-chinese-vessels-in-indian-ocean-region-india-keeping-close-watch-navy-chief/article66793087.ece

Institute for Security and Development Policy. (2023, March 22). India in a world of asymmetrical multipolarity – Institute for Security and Development Policy. https://isdp.eu/publication/india-in-a-world-of-asymmetrical-multipolarity/

Air University (AU). (2023, April 24). Limited hard balancing: Explaining India’s counter response to Chinese. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3371481/limited-hard-balancing-explaining-indias-counter-response-to-chinese-encircleme/

Jazeera, Al. (2021, November 22). President Xi: China will not seek dominance over Southeast Asia. South China Sea News | Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/11/22/xi-china-will-not-seek-dominance-over-southeast-asia

ICWA. (n.d.). Evolving perspectives on AIIB – Indian Council of World Affairs (Government of India). https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=3&ls_id=4791&lid=2210

Deshpande, P. P. (2023, July 8). BRICS’s plan to float a common currency & India’s reaction to it. Times of India Blog. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/truth-lies-and-politics/bricss-plan-to-float-a-common-currency-indias-reaction-to-it/